Why supplement interactions need context
Interaction checking is only useful when the app explains what was researched, what is unknown, and what to do next.
A warning is not a strategy
Users do not need a mysterious score. They need to know which pairing is helpful, neutral, cautionary, or worth separating.
The explanation should be concrete enough to turn into a schedule change.
Unknown pairs should stay honest
A stack with five supplements has ten possible pairs. If only half are researched, the app should say that clearly.
Low-confidence claims should not quietly change a user's score or create fake precision.
The protocol has to match the advice
If onboarding recommends zinc at lunch and magnesium at night, the interaction feedback should reinforce that logic instead of suggesting the schedule is flawed.
Trust comes from consistency between the recommendation, the score, and the daily protocol.
Sources
Medical note
Stackhero is a supplement tracking and research organization tool, not medical advice. Review supplements, dose changes, and medication interactions with a qualified professional.